<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Tumbleweed Rants</title>
  <subtitle>Stefano's World</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tumbleweed.org.za/2006/11/24/playing-with-a-uk2net-server"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://tumbleweed.org.za/node/34/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://tumbleweed.org.za/node/34/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-01-02T19:55:08+00:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Playing with a uk2.net server</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tumbleweed.org.za/2006/11/24/playing-with-a-uk2net-server" />
    <id>http://tumbleweed.org.za/2006/11/24/playing-with-a-uk2net-server</id>
    <published>2006-11-24T18:31:32+00:00</published>
    <updated>2008-01-02T19:55:08+00:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>tumbleweed</name>
    </author>
    <category term="hosting" />
    <category term="internet" />
    <category term="me-elsewhere" />
    <category term="uk2" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m having fun with a <a href="http://www.uk2.net/" title="A respected and cheap docklands dedicated host">uk2.net</a>&nbsp;dedicated&nbsp;server.</p>

<p>A video-hosting site that I admin is currently hosted on a colo box with some <em>very</em> expensive bandwith. While the burstable bandwidth we can get on it is <em>amazing</em>, it&#8217;s staggeringly expensive, and we have a small quota. Thus we can&#8217;t sustain too&nbsp;much&nbsp;traffic.</p>

<p>For poorer customers, I want to look at some cheaper bandwidth&#8230; <span class="caps"><span class="caps">UK2</span></span>.net are having a special where you can try a dedicated box for £0.99 for it&#8217;s first month. With 2TiB of traffic / month (2 orders of magnitude more than the co-lo box) it is more than up to the job, and upgrading to an un-metered 10M link&nbsp;is&nbsp;cheap.</p>

<p>So, I&#8217;m trying out the mid-range option. I get a GiB of <span class="caps"><span class="caps">RAM</span></span>, <span class="caps"><span class="caps">80GB</span></span> <span class="caps"><span class="caps">HDD</span></span>, and more bandwidth than I know what to do with. A bittorent :-) test shows that it&#8217;s reasonably&nbsp;well&nbsp;connected.</p>

<p>Now to set up a demo website and see how it compares to our current&nbsp;uber-expensive&nbsp;box.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m having fun with a <a href="http://www.uk2.net/" title="A respected and cheap docklands dedicated host">uk2.net</a> dedicated&nbsp;server.</p>

<p>A video-hosting site that I admin is currently hosted on a colo box with some <em>very</em> expensive bandwith. While the burstable bandwidth we can get on it is <em>amazing</em>, it&#8217;s staggeringly expensive, and we have a small quota. Thus we can&#8217;t sustain too much&nbsp;traffic.</p>

<p>For poorer customers, I want to look at some cheaper bandwidth&#8230; <span class="caps">UK2</span>.net are having a special where you can try a dedicated box for £0.99 for it&#8217;s first month. With 2TiB of traffic / month (2 orders of magnitude more than the co-lo box) it is more than up to the job, and upgrading to an un-metered 10M link is&nbsp;cheap.</p>

<p>So, I&#8217;m trying out the mid-range option. I get a GiB of <span class="caps">RAM</span>, <span class="caps">80GB</span> <span class="caps">HDD</span>, and more bandwidth than I know what to do with. A bittorent :-) test shows that it&#8217;s reasonably well&nbsp;connected.</p>

<p>Now to set up a demo website and see how it compares to our current uber-expensive&nbsp;box.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
