<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Tumbleweed Rants</title>
  <subtitle>Stefano's World</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tumbleweed.org.za/2007/11/08/uncapped-local-access"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://tumbleweed.org.za/node/102/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://tumbleweed.org.za/node/102/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-01-02T19:55:15+00:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Uncapped Local access</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tumbleweed.org.za/2007/11/08/uncapped-local-access" />
    <id>http://tumbleweed.org.za/2007/11/08/uncapped-local-access</id>
    <published>2007-11-08T15:29:56+00:00</published>
    <updated>2008-01-02T19:55:15+00:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>tumbleweed</name>
    </author>
    <category term="adsl" />
    <category term="dsl" />
    <category term="internet" />
    <category term="local-only" />
    <category term="saix" />
    <category term="south-africa" />
    <category term="telkom" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve read that <a href="http://mybroadband.co.za/news/ADSL/1854.html">Telkom is implementing uncapped local access</a>, as mandated by <span class="caps"><span class="caps">ICASA</span></span>. The regulation states &#8220;local bandwidth shall not be subject to the cap&#8221;, but nobody seriously thinks Telkom will follow this to the letter. There is a huge market in inter-office VPNs over <span class="caps"><span class="caps">ADSL</span></span>, and Telkom don&#8217;t want to lose out on that&nbsp;revenue&nbsp;stream.</p>

<p>Currently the savvy users out there use hacks like <a href="http://tumbleweed.org.za/2007/09/02/local-only-dsl/">mine</a> to least-cost-route local traffic over cheaper <a href="http://www.is.co.za/"><span class="caps"><span class="caps">IS</span></span></a> &#8220;Local-Only&#8221; accounts (like <a href="http://www.webafrica.co.za/adsl/is_local/">these</a>). Hell, even ISPs route their clients&#8217; local traffic over the <span class="caps"><span class="caps">IS</span></span>&nbsp;Local-Only&nbsp;accounts.</p>

<p>From what I&#8217;ve heard from <a href="http://www.frogfoot.com/">the friendly frogs</a>, Telkom are really just going to keep it simple, and implement the equivalent of <a href="http://www.webafrica.co.za/adsl/is/"><span class="caps"><span class="caps">IS</span></span> <span class="caps"><span class="caps">DSL</span></span></a> accounts, where after you get capped, you get another, local-only cap. This can be implemented with Radius only, and will (to some extent) prevent the service from being abused&nbsp;be&nbsp;everybody.</p>

<p>So yes, we all still need our separate <span class="caps"><span class="caps">IS</span></span> Local-Only accounts, and do our own&nbsp;<span class="caps"><span class="caps">LCR</span></span>.</p>

<p>Anybody who thinks Telkom is doing any good for South Africa, go and sit in a&nbsp;corner&nbsp;now!</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve read that <a href="http://mybroadband.co.za/news/ADSL/1854.html">Telkom is implementing uncapped local access</a>, as mandated by <span class="caps">ICASA</span>. The regulation states &#8220;local bandwidth shall not be subject to the cap&#8221;, but nobody seriously thinks Telkom will follow this to the letter. There is a huge market in inter-office VPNs over <span class="caps">ADSL</span>, and Telkom don&#8217;t want to lose out on that revenue&nbsp;stream.</p>

<p>Currently the savvy users out there use hacks like <a href="http://tumbleweed.org.za/2007/09/02/local-only-dsl/">mine</a> to least-cost-route local traffic over cheaper <a href="http://www.is.co.za/"><span class="caps">IS</span></a> &#8220;Local-Only&#8221; accounts (like <a href="http://www.webafrica.co.za/adsl/is_local/">these</a>). Hell, even ISPs route their clients&#8217; local traffic over the <span class="caps">IS</span> Local-Only&nbsp;accounts.</p>

<p>From what I&#8217;ve heard from <a href="http://www.frogfoot.com/">the friendly frogs</a>, Telkom are really just going to keep it simple, and implement the equivalent of <a href="http://www.webafrica.co.za/adsl/is/"><span class="caps">IS</span> <span class="caps">DSL</span></a> accounts, where after you get capped, you get another, local-only cap. This can be implemented with Radius only, and will (to some extent) prevent the service from being abused be&nbsp;everybody.</p>

<p>So yes, we all still need our separate <span class="caps">IS</span> Local-Only accounts, and do our own&nbsp;<span class="caps">LCR</span>.</p>

<p>Anybody who thinks Telkom is doing any good for South Africa, go and sit in a corner&nbsp;now!</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
